Comments on: Compiling with Clang http://tenderlovemaking.com/2010/01/03/compiling-with-clang/ The act of making love, tenderly. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:38:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Michel Demazure http://tenderlovemaking.com/2010/01/03/compiling-with-clang/comment-page-1/#comment-108090 Michel Demazure Sun, 17 Jan 2010 08:00:46 +0000 http://tenderlovemaking.com/?p=414#comment-108090 Nothing to do with Clang, but I don't know your email. It's about racc : it apparently does not parse the new 1.9 hash syntax. As a consequence, flog and flay abort. Am I right ? If so, do you plan something to fix it ? Or to have flog (and flay) use another parser ? Flog is a nice tool. It would be a pity to let it go ... All th best, M. Nothing to do with Clang, but I don’t know your email.

It’s about racc : it apparently does not parse the new 1.9 hash syntax. As a consequence, flog and flay abort.

Am I right ? If so, do you plan something to fix it ? Or to have flog (and flay) use another parser ?

Flog is a nice tool. It would be a pity to let it go …

All th best,
M.

]]> By: Aaron Patterson http://tenderlovemaking.com/2010/01/03/compiling-with-clang/comment-page-1/#comment-107407 Aaron Patterson Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:45:31 +0000 http://tenderlovemaking.com/?p=414#comment-107407 @Nobu I suppose it's possible. I believe the ABI output from Clang is compatible with GCC so the extension still works. @Nobu I suppose it’s possible. I believe the ABI output from Clang is compatible with GCC so the extension still works.

]]> By: Nobuyoshi Nakada http://tenderlovemaking.com/2010/01/03/compiling-with-clang/comment-page-1/#comment-107395 Nobuyoshi Nakada Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:35:44 +0000 http://tenderlovemaking.com/?p=414#comment-107395 rbconfig.rb may not be compatible? rbconfig.rb may not be compatible?

]]>